THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT IN ANNOUNCEMENT OF SUPREME COURT NOMINATION OF JUDGE RUTH BADER GINSBURG The Rose Garden
2:07 P.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT: Please be seated. I wish you all a good afternoon, and I thank the members of the Congress and other interested Americans who are here.
In just a few days when the Supreme Court concludes its term, Justice Byron White will begin a new chapter in his long and productive life. He has served the Court as he has lived, with distinction, intelligence and honor. And he retires from public service with the deep gratitude of all the American people.
Article II, Section II of the United States Constitution empowers the President to select a nominee to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court of the United States. This responsibility is one of the most significant duties assigned to the President by the Constitution. A Supreme Court justice has life tenure, unlike the President -- (laughter) -- and along with his or her colleagues, decides the most significant questions of our time and shapes the continuing contours of our liberty.
I care a lot about this responsibility, not only because I am a lawyer, but because I used to teach constitutional law and I served my state as attorney general. I know well how the Supreme Court affects the lives of all Americans personally and deeply. I know clearly that a Supreme Court justice should have the heart and spirit, the talent and discipline, the knowledge, common sense and wisdom to translate the hopes of the American people as presented in the cases before it into an enduring body of constitutional law. A constitutional law that will preserve our most cherished values that are enshrined in that Constitution, and at the same time, enable the American people to move forward.
That is what I promised the American people in a justice when I ran for President, and I believe it is a promise that I am delivering on today.
After careful reflection, I am proud to nominate for Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the United States Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. I will send her name to the Senate to fill the vacancy created by Justice White's retirement.
As I told Judge Ginsburg last night when I called to ask her to accept the nomination, I decided on her for three reasons: First, in her years on the bench she had genuinely distinguished herself as one of our nation's best judges -- progressive in outlook, wise in judgment, balanced and fair in her opinions.
Second, over the course of a lifetime in her pioneering work in behalf of the women of this country, she has compiled a truly historic record of achievement in the finest traditions of American law and citizenship.
And finally, I believe that in the years ahead, she will be able to be a force for consensus-building on the Supreme Court, just as she has been on the Court of Appeals, so that our judges can become an instrument of our common unity in the expression of their fidelity to the Constitution.
Judge Ginsburg received her undergraduate degree from Cornell. She attended both Harvard and Columbia Law Schools and served on the Law Reviews of both institutions, the first woman to have earned this distinction. She was a law clerk to a federal judge, a law professor at Rutgers and Columbia Law Schools. She argued six landmark cases on behalf of women before the United States Supreme Court and, happily, won five out of six.
For the past 13 years she has served on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, the second highest court in our country, where her work has brought her national acclaim and on which she was able to amass a record that caused a national legal journal in 1991 to name her as one of the nation's leading centrist judges.
In the months and years ahead, the country will have the opportunity to get to know much more about Ruth Ginsburg's achievements, decency, humanity and fairness. People will find, as I have, that this nominee is a person of immense character.
Quite simply, what's in her record speaks volumes about what is in her heart. Throughout her life, she has repeatedly stood for the individual, the person less well-off, the outsider in society, and has given those people greater hope by telling them that they have a place in our legal system by giving them a sense that the Constitution and the laws protect all the American people, not simply the powerful.
Judge Ginsburg has also proven herself to be a healer -- what attorneys call a moderate. Time and again, her moral imagination has cooled the fires of her colleagues' discord, ensuring that the right of jurists to dissent ennobles the law without entangling the Court.
The announcement of this vacancy brought forth a unique outpouring of support from distinguished Americans on Judge Ginsburg's behalf. What caused that outpouring is the essential quality of the Judge herself. Her deep respect for others and her willingness to subvert self-interest to the interest of our people and their institutions.
In one of her own writings about what it is like to be a Justice, Judge Ginsburg quotes Justice Lewis Brandeis, who once said, "The Supreme Court is not a place for solo performers." If this is a time for consensus-building on the Court -- and I believe it is -- Judge Ginsburg will be an able and effective architect of that effort.
It is important to me that Judge Ginsburg came to her views and attitudes by doing, not merely by reading and studying. Despite her enormous ability and academic achievements, she could not get a job with a law firm in the early 1960s because she was a woman and the mother of a small child.
Having experienced discrimination, she devoted the next 20 years of her career to fighting it and making this country a better place for our wives, our mothers, our sisters and our daughters. She, herself, argued and won many of the women's rights cases before the Supreme Court in the 1970s. Many admirers of her work say that she is to the women's movement what former Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall was to the movement for the rights of African Americans. I can think of no greater compliment to bestow on an American lawyer.
And she has done all of this and a lot of other things as well by raising a family with her husband, Marty, whom she married 39 years ago, as a very young woman. (Laughter.) Together they had two children, Jane and James, and they now have two grandchildren. Hers is a remarkable record of distinction and achievement, both professional and personal.
During the selection process, we reviewed the qualifications of more than 40 potential nominees. It was a long, exhaustive search. And during that time we identified several wonderful Americans whom I think could be outstanding nominees to the Supreme Court in the future.
Among the best were the Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, whose strong legal background as Arizona's Attorney General and recent work balancing the competing interests of environmentalists and others in the very difficult issues affecting the American west made him a highly qualified candidate for the Court. And I had the unusual experience, something unique to me, of being flooded with calls all across America from Babbitt admirers who pleaded with me not to put him on the Court and take him away from the Interior Department.
I also carefully considered the Chief Judge of the First Circuit, Judge Stephen Breyer of Boston, a man whose character, confidence and legal scholarship impressed me very greatly. I believe he has a very major role to play in public life. I believe he is superbly qualified to be on the Court. And I think either one of these candidates, as well as the handful of others whom I closely considered, may well find themselves in that position someday in the future.
Let me say in closing that Ruth Bader Ginsburg cannot be called a liberal or a conservative; she has proved herself too thoughtful for such labels. As she, herself, put it in one of her articles, and I quote: "The greatest figures of the American judiciary have been independent thinking individuals with open, but not empty minds; individuals willing to listen and to learn. They have exhibited a readiness to reexamine their own premises, liberal or conservative, as thoroughly as those of others." That, I believe, describes Judge Ginsburg. And those, I too, believe are the qualities of a great justice.
If, as I believe, the measure of a person's values can best be measured by examining the life the person lives, then Judge Ginsburg's values are the very ones that represent the best in America. I am proud to nominate this path-breaking attorney, advocate and judge to be the 107th Justice to the United States Supreme Court. (Applause.)
JUDGE GINSBURG: Mr. President, I am grateful beyond measure for the confidence you have placed in me, and I will strive with all that I have to live up to your expectations in making this appointment.
I appreciate, too, the special caring of Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, the more so because I do not actually know the Senator. I was born and brought up in New York, the state Senator Moynihan represents, and he was the very first person to call with good wishes when President Carter nominated me in 1980 to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Senator Moynihan has offered the same encouragement on this occasion.
May I introduce at this happy moment three people very special to me -- my husband, Martin D. Ginsburg; my son-in-law, George T. Sparrow, Jr.; and my son, James Stephen Ginsburg. (Applause.)
The announcement the President just made is significant, I believe, because it contributes to the end of the days when women, at least half the talent pool in our society, appear in high places only as one-at-a-time performers. Recall that when President Carter took office in 1976, no woman ever served on the Supreme Court. And only one woman, Shirley Hufstedler, of California then served at the next federal court level, the United States Courts of Appeals. Today, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor graces the Supreme Court bench. And close to 25 women serve at the Federal Court of Appeals level, too, as chief judges.
I am confident that more will soon join them. That seems to me inevitable given the change in law school enrollment. My law school class in that late 1950s numbered over 500. That class included less than 10 women. As the President said, not a law firm in the entire city of New York bid for my employment as a lawyer when I earned my degree. Today, few law schools have female enrollment under 40 percent, and several have reached or passed the 50-percent mark. And thanks to Title VII, no entry doors are barred.
My daughter, Jane, reminded me a few hours ago in a good-luck call from Australia of a sign of the change we have had the good fortune to experience. In her high school yearbook, on her graduation in 1973, the listing for Jane Ginsburg, under ambition, was: "To see her mother appointed to the Supreme Court." (Laughter.) The next line read: "If necessary, Jane will appoint her." (Laughter.) Jane is so pleased, Mr. President, that you did it instead; and her brother, James, is, too.
I expect to be asked in some detail about my views of the work of a good judge on a high court bench. This afternoon is not the moment for extended remarks on that subject, but I might state a few prime guides. Chief Justice Rehnquist offered one I keep in the front of my mind: "A judge is bound to decide each case fairly in accord with the relevant facts and the applicable law even when the decision is not," as he put it, "what the home crowd wants."
Next, I know no better summary than the one Justice O'Connor recently provided, drawn from a paper by New York University Law School Professor Burt Neuborne. The remarks concern the enduring influence of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. They read: "When a modern constitutional judge is confronted with a hard case, Holmes is at her side with three gentle reminders. First, intellectual honesty about the available policy choices. Second, disciplined selfrestraint in respecting the majority's policy choice. And, third, principled commitment to defense of individual autonomy even in the face of majority action. To that, I can only say amen.
I am indebted to so many for this extraordinary chance and challenge: To a revived women's movement in the 1970s that opened doors for people like me. To the civil rights movement of the 1960s from which the women's movement drew inspiration. To my teaching colleagues at Rutgers and Columbia; and for 13 years, my D.C. Circuit colleagues who shaped and heightened my appreciation of the value of collegiality.
Most closely, I have been aided by my life's partner, Martin D. Ginsburg, who has been since our teenage years my best friend and biggest booster; by my mother-in-law, Evelyn Ginsburg, the most supportive parent a person could have; and by a daughter and son, with the taste to appreciate that Daddy cooks ever so much better than Mommy -- (laughter) -- and so phased me out of the kitchen at a relatively early age.
Finally, I know Hillary Rodham Clinton has encouraged and supported the President's decision to utilize the skills and talents of all the people of the United States. I did not until today know Mrs. Clinton, but I hasten to add that I am not the first member of my family to stand close to her. There is another I love dearly to whom the First Lady is already an old friend, my wonderful granddaughter, Clara -- (laughter) -- witness this super, unposed photograph taken last October when Mrs. Clinton visited the nursery school in New York and led the little ones in "the tooth-brush song." (Laughter.) This small person right in front is Clara.
I have a last thank-you; it is to my mother, Celia Amster Bader, the bravest and strongest person I have known, who was taken from me much too soon. I pray that I may be all that she would have been had she lived in an age when women could aspire and achieve, and daughters are cherished as much as sons.
I look forward to stimulating weeks this summer; and if I am confirmed, to working at a neighboring Court to the best of my ability for the advancement of the law in the service of society. Thank you. (Applause.)
Q The withdrawal of the Guinier nomination, sir, and your apparent focus on Judge Breyer and your turn, late, it seems, to Judge Ginsburg, may have created an impression, perhaps unfair, of a certain zig-zag quality in the decision-making process here. I wonder, sir, if you could kind of walk us through it and perhaps disabuse us of any notion we might have along those lines. Thank you.
THE PRESIDENT: I have long since given up the thought that I could disabuse some of you of turning any substantive decision into anything but political process. How you could ask a question like that after the statement she just made is beyond me. (Applause.)
END2:30 P.M. EDT